tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-72670114376811906692024-03-05T21:28:53.302-05:00Reality Check Radio BlogThis is the companion blog to the Reality Check Radio program on Blog Talk Radio.Reality Checkhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/00126783152381564733noreply@blogger.comBlogger59125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7267011437681190669.post-51663083685400284402015-05-16T11:10:00.000-04:002015-05-16T11:10:15.254-04:00The End of the Birther Movement?First, I am reactivating my Blogger Blog at least temporarily for reasons I will get into later.<br />
<br />
Doctor Conspiracy left an interesting <a href="http://www.birtherreport.com/2015/05/gallups-sheriff-arpaio-obama.html#IDComment971651511">comment </a>at Birther Report:<br />
<br />
<blockquote class="tr_bq">
I don't know if Gallups realized it, but his show today put the last nail in the coffin of the birther movement. <br />
<br />
Gallups confirmed what I have been saying for almost a year now, that
the "earth shattering" information that he and Zullo were talking about
starting around the end of 2013, the deep, dark turn, was exactly the
alleged CIA data dump from Dennis Montgomery. <br />
<br />
What is so utterly devastating about this confirmation is that Sheriff
Joe Arpaio himself admitted in open court last month that the Montgomery
information was junk. Chief Deputy Sheridan testified that Montgomery
was just "stringing us along" and that is what Zullo has been doing to
you for a year and half. <br />
<br />
The great hope of the birthers: the Arpaio/Zullo investigation, the universe shattering revelation--all of it was junk. </blockquote>
Doc was referring to Gallups' rambling and bizarre <a href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aiDQP7mynKs">segment </a>on his Freedom Friday program on May 15, 2015 in which he confirmed that the much ballyhooed "universe shattering"* evidence that he and Zullo had been talking about in 2013 and 2014 was indeed connected with what has now been dubbed the "Seattle Operation" work with con man Dennis Montgomery. Doc conveniently provided a transcript of the segment in this <a href="http://www.obamaconspiracy.org/2015/05/carl-gallups-makes-clear-association-between-earth-shattering-information-and-confidential-informant-montgomery/">article </a>yesterday. <br />
<br />
Doc hit a nerve at BR and the self proclaimed leader of the pack there <a href="http://intensedebate.com/people/Pobbo">Falcon </a>posted this idiotic reply:<br />
<br />
<blockquote class="tr_bq">
Horseshit. They had Obama by the balls twice. The first presser said
that Obama used forged documents. Interesting how you condone that for a
communist - but would certainly repudiate it for a Conservative. You'd
be leading the charge to get rid of any Republican with forged
documents. <br />
<br />
They also have Obama on foreign student status - a well known bit that I
personally released more than a year ago. And you know it's true. <br />
<br />
This horsecrap with some Montgomery has nothing to do with Obama and his
surrogates forging documents and put them on official governmental
websites. That all occurred long before Montgomery ever came along. And
it was all created by Obama in a criminal act of fraud against the
United States. <br />
<br />
Another fail by you. And don't forget - you were named in affidavit that
was forcibly unsealed in Vogt's discovery. You're hardly an un-partial
party.</blockquote>
It has been amusing to watch Falcon's schizophrenic machinations over Gallups and Zullo. He alternates between whining that they have nothing or are intimidated into silence to proclaiming that "A/Z Day" is coming soon so all the Obots better get ready to go to jail. <br />
<br />
I should disclose that I am privy to Falcon's real name and location. I will only say he seems to be a nobody whose self importance on the Internet is entirely a fiction of his own creation. He tends to infest one forum or blog at a time. Before Birtherism came along he had a bizarre fascination with missing persons particularly <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Disappearance_of_Natalee_Holloway">Natalee Holloway</a> in discussions at a forum called <a href="http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php">Scared Monkeys</a> where he posted using the name "Rob". <br />
<br />
So is this the end of the Birther Movement? I suppose it depends on how you define "end". Are there still Birthers? Of course and some will be until they are dead and gone. However, what is at an end is any hope that Joe Arpaio and Mike Zullo will ride in on white horses to remove the nasty black man from the White House. Arpaio now is faced with a certain civil contempt citation in the Melendres case and it appears headed to much worse for him. Now that the "Seattle Operation" has come to light things aren't looking rosy for Mike Zullo either. Not that fantasies of removing Obama were ever real but I think even the die hards like Bob Nelson at BR, Mark Gillar and even Falcon know it's over. <br />
<br />
* Note that Gallups downgraded what was once "universe shattering" to plain ordinary "earth shattering" evidence. Mathematically that is a downgrade of unquantifiable proportion. <br />
<br />
<br />Reality Checkhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/00126783152381564733noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7267011437681190669.post-22280233879449516692015-04-25T09:17:00.001-04:002015-04-25T09:17:21.935-04:00Test post.Reality Checkhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/00126783152381564733noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7267011437681190669.post-47263534988320236422012-01-23T19:34:00.005-05:002014-02-19T08:46:57.360-05:00My Blog Has Moved<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="http://movingplanner101.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/11/moving-van.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="clear: left; float: left; margin-bottom: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" src="http://movingplanner101.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/11/moving-van.jpg" height="155" width="200" /></a></div>
Well, it has always been "moving' but it is really moving now. :) The RC Radio Blog has moved to a WordPress.com Blog. The new address is <a href="http://rcradioblog.wordpress.com/">http://rcradioblog.wordpress.com/</a><br />
Please update your links and bookmarks. Thanks to all the bloggers who have linked to my blog. I am updating the blog roll at the new blog so if your blog is linked now it will soon be linked at the new blog. If you do not want you blog linked please let me know.<br />
<br />
You can continue to comment on existing articles at the new blog. Comments are closed on this one.Reality Checkhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/00126783152381564733noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7267011437681190669.post-11508071837732066522012-01-22T14:09:00.004-05:002012-01-22T14:15:05.785-05:00The Circus is Coming to Georgia and Judge Malihi is the Ringmaster<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;"><a href="http://www.indecisionforever.com/files/2009/08/o-rly1.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="clear: left; float: left; margin-bottom: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" height="200" src="http://www.indecisionforever.com/files/2009/08/o-rly1.jpg" width="169" /></a></div>Verbalobe (the creator of the brilliant <a href="http://birferdreams.livejournal.com/">Birther Dreams </a>cartoon series) wrote a post at the Fogbow that I believe captures my own thoughts on the Georgia ballot challenge:<br />
<blockquote class="tr_bq"><div style="text-align: left;"><a href="http://fellowshipofminds.files.wordpress.com/2012/01/michael-malihi.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="clear: left; float: left; margin-bottom: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" height="200" src="http://fellowshipofminds.files.wordpress.com/2012/01/michael-malihi.jpg" width="133" /></a></div><span style="font-weight: bold;"><span style="color: #0040bf;"><span style="font-style: italic;">If</span> Judge Malihi permits the full <span style="font-style: italic;">Cirque du Merde</span>, in the end he and Georgia will disgrace themselves, even though the goal may be to disgrace the President. Partly because of the plain facts and Americans' inherent decency and good sense; but mostly because Orly Taitz makes anyone who provides a venue for her twaddle look irresponsible, or worse. <br />
<br />
As a matter of self defense, the Republicans in Georgia, particularly the Republican Secretary of State, should put a stop to this extravaganza. The COLB proves Obama is eligible and it's not a secret. There's really nothing to "prove." But the Republicans in Georgia will prove something about themselves and the nightsoil may well spatter everyone <span style="font-style: italic;">except</span> the President. <img alt="[-o<" src="http://www.thefogbow.com/forum/images/smilies/pray.gif" title="praying" /> <br />
</span></span><br />
<span style="font-weight: bold;"><span style="color: #0040bf;"> If this goes forward as it appears to be unfolding, some people who think they're clever now, will have their own "oh shit" moment, and it will be too late. </span></span></blockquote>If you are like me you had to cheat and Google <span style="color: black;">"</span><span style="color: black;">du Merde". </span><span style="color: black;">I would have just said "freak show". I don't know what Judge Malihi's motivations might be for letting Orly misuse his name on bogus subpoenas downloaded from the court web site. We can speculate everything from him being a closet Birther to </span><span style="color: black;">being a frustrated low level administrative law judge who wants his moment in the spotlight. In the end it will not matter for Barack Obama and the Democrats. He will be the candidate for the party in all fifty states and the other districts and territories represented at the convention in September. I hope Mr. Jablonski shows up at the hearing, submits a COLB and calls this hearing for what it is. The Georgia Republicans will then be known as the party that said to the first black president in the year 2012 "show me your papers, boy." </span><span style="color: black; font-weight: bold;"><span style="font-style: italic;"> </span></span>Reality Checkhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/00126783152381564733noreply@blogger.com2tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7267011437681190669.post-91352999454352411252012-01-21T09:13:00.000-05:002012-01-21T09:13:00.823-05:00Woodman v Corsi, et. al. and a Special Edition of RC Radio<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;"><a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEjWuyRBXQTKF2A0MuzBXunIkjJYZ6fsI6iNE5noyqo-UgmUgXGNPObbCXGIfzjW_WVVCFH3TXT8Fw0scanJFDaIo5ysm3gt6ljFcE06whc3BCzJJPrOscqFX90khnt948gJB8zy5TS-nL3N/s1600/is-barack-obamas-birth-certificate-a-fraud-book.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="clear: left; float: left; margin-bottom: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" height="200" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEjWuyRBXQTKF2A0MuzBXunIkjJYZ6fsI6iNE5noyqo-UgmUgXGNPObbCXGIfzjW_WVVCFH3TXT8Fw0scanJFDaIo5ysm3gt6ljFcE06whc3BCzJJPrOscqFX90khnt948gJB8zy5TS-nL3N/s200/is-barack-obamas-birth-certificate-a-fraud-book.jpg" width="150" /></a></div>John Woodman will debate Mara Zebest, Karl Denninger, and Tom Harrison in the first hour and a half, and Jerome Corsi appearing for the last half hour on Mark Gillars Blog Talk show this afternoon at 3 PM EST. <br />
<br />
<div class="comment-body">Here is a direct link to the Gillar show. At 2 PM CST this should open and play: <a href="http://www.blogtalkradio.com/markgillar/2012/01/21/experts-debate-obamas-birth-certificate" rel="nofollow">Mark Gillar Show</a>. You can also call and listen on this number I believe: (646) 727-3170 (Mr. Gillar says he will not be taking questions.)<br />
<br />
John will also be on a special edtion of RC Radio immediately following for a “debriefing” starting at 5 PM EST/ 4 PM CST. The link is <a href="http://www.blogtalkradio.com/rcr/2012/01/21/rc-radio--lfbc-debate-wrapup-show" rel="nofollow">RC Radio Debate Wrapup Show</a> or you may call (347) 324-5546 to listen or ask a question.<br />
</div>Reality Checkhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/00126783152381564733noreply@blogger.com3tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7267011437681190669.post-64548613529013267472012-01-13T11:40:00.000-05:002012-01-13T11:40:43.578-05:00RC Radio will cover the subpoena enforcement hearing with a special show tonightA special episode of RC Radio is scheduled at 9 PM ET tonight to cover the hearing being held today in Judge Nishimura's court in Honolulu. Orly Taitz is seeking an order to have her "phony" subpoenas from Georgia to have Health Director Fuddy and others appear at the ballot challenge hearing in Atlanta on January 26 to be enforced by the court in Hawaii. Deputy AG Jill Nagamine may have other things in mind. <br />
<br />
Here is a direct link to the show: <a href="http://www.blogtalkradio.com/rcr/2012/01/14/reciprocating-supoenas--back-to-hawaii">Reciprocal Enforcement Hearing - Back to Hawaii</a>Reality Checkhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/00126783152381564733noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7267011437681190669.post-54024686562684528772012-01-02T09:18:00.004-05:002012-01-13T09:49:01.392-05:00RC Radio Natural Born Citizen Debate Challenge<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;"><a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEircnFHYvVbYiz2hcuTLVs0EfHWeqU9meLs-Y47VMJUFY2ymqHQ0S9S6vKOSlEByUCbzRxriIM0HeRBtPuPvktcy0nED31DcUn1_oDyZzJRgkhw4rTFeCwxuSOQ0KYJJ4ww4dXLvriq2f2K/s1600/birth-certificate-454-2.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="clear: left; float: left; margin-bottom: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" height="200" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEircnFHYvVbYiz2hcuTLVs0EfHWeqU9meLs-Y47VMJUFY2ymqHQ0S9S6vKOSlEByUCbzRxriIM0HeRBtPuPvktcy0nED31DcUn1_oDyZzJRgkhw4rTFeCwxuSOQ0KYJJ4ww4dXLvriq2f2K/s200/birth-certificate-454-2.jpg" width="189" /></a></div>I would like to start off 2012 with a bang!<br />
<br />
Who is a natural born citizen? Before late 2008 there was not much discussion of this question except in some obscure legal articles and talk about a few candidates not born on US soil like Mitt Romney's father (born in Mexico) and John McCain (born in the Canal Zone). Recently, many of those known as the "Birthers" started telling us that almost everything we learned about this term for 200 years is wrong. In 2008 during the run up to the election all the conversation was about "the birth certificate" but now the debate has moved to the claim that to be a natural born citizen requires <i>both </i>parents to be citizens <i>at the time of birth</i>. Even some politicians in New Hampshire and in Georgia have embraced the idea. What gives? I say let's get this settled.<br />
<br />
I challenge proponents of both sides of the discussion on the definition of the term "natural born citizen" in the United States Constitution under the requirements for president and vice president to a debate on Reality Check Radio on Wednesday, January 25, 2012. I have arranged for up to three supporters of the traditional definition that a US citizen at birth is a natural born citizen to represent the "Obot" side of the debate. I challenge the "Birther" side to provide up to three proponents to take on the challenge.<br />
<br />
The debate will be 90 minutes long and both sides will have equal time. Timing will be strictly enforced. Each side will be given equal time for opening and closing arguments. Each side will be able to ask the other side 4 questions of their choice and have time for rebuttal to the answers. The moderator (me) will ask 1 or 2 questions if issues appear to need further discussion. The remainder of the show will allow the listeners to call and ask questions. <br />
<br />
I extend this challenge to Leo Donofrio, Mario Apuzzo, Charles Kerchner, Orly Taitz, Dean Haskins, Jerome Corsi, or any other proponent of the "two citizen parent" definition of natural born citizen. This is your chance to prove you are right. The first three who accept will be selected as participants unless they wish to give up a spot to someone prior to the debate. <br />
<br />
I will enforce a fair debate. If you are interested please contact me at realitycheck1776 at gmail period com or through the "Contact Me" link on rcradioshow.blogspot.com<br />
<br />
<b>Please feel free to link or copy this article to your blog or forum to get the word out. A refusal by either side to defend their position will be noted. </b>Reality Checkhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/00126783152381564733noreply@blogger.com66tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7267011437681190669.post-49947299574415673662012-01-01T17:36:00.003-05:002012-01-01T17:44:27.491-05:00Paul Irey's ReplyMr. Irey said he tried to post some of the following comments here on my blog but as it turned out he was replying to a <a href="http://beforeitsnews.com/story/1569/302/Paul_Irey_backtracks.html">website </a>that linked to Doctor Conspiracy's comment on my article. Mr. Irey then sent me a couple of emails with comments. I told Mr. Irey that I would publish his comments here unedited. I will provide additional comments later. <br />
___________________________________________________________________________________ <br />
<blockquote class="tr_bq"><span style="color: #0060bf; font-size: small;"> <span style="font-family: Arial,Helvetica,sans-serif;"> Obviously it is unfair for the moderator of "Reality Check Radio" to use my name but he won't use his own. Who is the author of this article? Why doesn't he release his name as I have? The reason the WND story is not released yet is because ... first they decided to wait until after Christmas ... and second ... last week I learned that I would be in possession of a high resolution scan of a legitimate birth certificate from the Honolulu dept. of health from the era that will allow me to compare it to the problems I have found with Obama's BC. This article should put a real dent in Woodman's prior findings that there is nothing wrong with Obama's BC. Wait and see. Then better evidence is still coming. I have two more studies in progress and another researcher has even better proof. I did not bet Mr. ??? $5,000 that officials at the health dept. would go to jail because ... even though they are guilty ... gov. has probably guaranteed them that no one would face charges in any case.</span></span><br />
<div style="-moz-font-feature-settings: normal; -moz-font-language-override: normal; font-family: Arial,Helvetica,sans-serif; font-size-adjust: none; font-stretch: normal; font-style: normal; font-variant: normal; font-weight: normal; line-height: normal; margin: 0px;"><span style="color: #0060bf; font-size: small;"><br />
</span></div><div style="-moz-font-feature-settings: normal; -moz-font-language-override: normal; font-family: Arial,Helvetica,sans-serif; font-size-adjust: none; font-stretch: normal; font-style: normal; font-variant: normal; font-weight: normal; line-height: normal; margin: 0px;"><span style="color: #0060bf; font-size: small;"> Anyone who doesn't believe Larry Sinclair ... only has to look at what happened to Cain. Here was another black candidate for president quickly hounded out of the running by media that started out only repeating rumors of the type they could have used with Larry Sinclair's claims ... but did not. You also will not repeat our discussion of Mr. Sinclair being arrested at the National Press Club 2 blocks from the White House where he gave a news conference relating his story to the media ... that never reported anything about his presentation ... including the fact that he was arrested at that news conference in front of the press on a warrant issued by Beau Binden ... the son of Joe Biden ... on false charges ... two days before the Democratic National Convention that led to Joe Biden being nominated for Vice President. Political favor? The major media should have at least reported that false arrest. But they were not allowed to ... and <b><i>still</i></b> are not allowed to. So much for media honesty.</span></div><div style="-moz-font-feature-settings: normal; -moz-font-language-override: normal; font-family: Arial,Helvetica,sans-serif; font-size-adjust: none; font-stretch: normal; font-style: normal; font-variant: normal; font-weight: normal; line-height: normal; margin: 0px;"><span style="color: #0060bf; font-size: small;"><br />
</span></div><div style="-moz-font-feature-settings: normal; -moz-font-language-override: normal; font-family: Arial,Helvetica,sans-serif; font-size-adjust: none; font-stretch: normal; font-style: normal; font-variant: normal; font-weight: normal; line-height: normal; margin: 0px;"><span style="color: #0060bf; font-size: small;"> If you believe that major media editors can print whatever they like ... ask Mr. ??? why they did not print any news or statements from that night at the National Press Club in Wash. D.C. ... but ran Cain out of office on far less information? Government control is why. There is no other answer.</span></div><div style="-moz-font-feature-settings: normal; -moz-font-language-override: normal; font-family: Arial,Helvetica,sans-serif; font-size-adjust: none; font-stretch: normal; font-style: normal; font-variant: normal; font-weight: normal; line-height: normal; margin: 0px;"><span style="color: #0060bf; font-size: small;"><br />
</span></div><div style="-moz-font-feature-settings: normal; -moz-font-language-override: normal; font-family: Arial,Helvetica,sans-serif; font-size-adjust: none; font-stretch: normal; font-style: normal; font-variant: normal; font-weight: normal; line-height: normal; margin: 0px;"><span style="color: #0060bf; font-size: small;"> Also we learned later that it was the White House copier that created the distortions that would have deceived anyone. We notified the FBI that the White House might not always want copies coming from there to be so easily identified because of those peculiar distortions ... and there might have even been devices planted that would easily identify any document copied at the White House and given unintended intelligence to spy agencies in other countries. Planting spy devices in copiers at important official locations is not new. We did it to the Russian embassy in D.C. years ago. Why didn't Mr. Woodman notify the White House himself immediately? All the newspapers that received the handouts that morning on the 27th of April had those distortions because it was the White House copier that made them. Because those handouts were far better in detail than the PDF released by the White House online ... is why I use them in the first place. Had the major media printed my evidence when it first came out ... we might have found this out much sooner. Doesn't anyone think it odd that major media refused to run the story about letters on the BC not matching each other ... but rumors of comments made by Herman Cain to a few women years ago were sufficient to slander the name of a black candidate for president? It was shameless.</span></div><div style="-moz-font-feature-settings: normal; -moz-font-language-override: normal; font-family: Arial,Helvetica,sans-serif; font-size-adjust: none; font-stretch: normal; font-style: normal; font-variant: normal; font-weight: normal; line-height: normal; margin: 0px; min-height: 14px;"><span style="font-size: small;"><br />
</span></div><div style="-moz-font-feature-settings: normal; -moz-font-language-override: normal; font-family: Arial,Helvetica,sans-serif; font-size-adjust: none; font-stretch: normal; font-style: normal; font-variant: normal; font-weight: normal; line-height: normal; margin: 0px;"><span style="color: #0060bf; font-size: small;">Paul Irey</span></div></blockquote>[He also sent these followup comments:]<br />
<blockquote class="tr_bq"><br />
<div>Mr. RC ???</div><div><br />
</div><div> If you are contesting my statements ... then your name has as much bearing as mine.</div><div><br />
</div><div> I attempted to "publish" the text in blue again at your website".</div><div><br />
</div><div> If it does not publish this time ... you should publish it yourself along with this statement. The supportive statements I had made to you during our conversation about the arrest of Larry Sinclair that <b><i>still</i></b> can not be mentioned in the major media ... even though it happened in front of 100 reporters at the National Press Club in 2008 ... during the time of the election process ... should be proof enough of the press censorship I mentioned. You also mention my contention that JFK was shot from the sewer drain but forgot to mention that I told you that I had seen the one time showing of the Marie Muchmore film on channel 5 in New York City that showed that the limo stopped at the moment of the fatal head shot. That's an important part of my story. The Zapruder film does not show that stop and has painted in the appearance of an exit wound in the front of his face. The attached poster shows that better. Media will not publish that or ever refer to the fact that the government's own evidence clearly contradicts itself. The fact that media will still not publish my poster ... even though none of the supporters of the Oswald did it alone theory ... including Gary Mack himself ... who is the curator of the Texas Schoolbook Depository Museum ... have ever been able to give me any kind of answer as to this contradiction. That's what I meant by a supportive statement ... and your not referring to what I said to support my claims was not "fairly representing our conversation".</div><div><br />
</div><div> In addition ... I read your statement ....</div><div><br />
</div><div><span style="font-family: 'Trebuchet MS',Arial,Helvetica,sans-serif; font-size: 18px; line-height: 23px;"><span style="color: #0060bf;">"I had the opportunity <span style="font-size: 24px;">to speak with Paul Irey on a Reality Check Radio program,</span> hosted by RC. I found Irey to be sincere and honest, but at the same deeply influenced by his own biases about the President. Honesty won out, and in conversations with RC, Irey admitted he was wrong in some of his claims. This hasn’t stopped the Birthers from continuing to use Irey’s prior reports as evidence."</span></span></div></blockquote>[Editorial comment: This is not my statement. See below.]<br />
<blockquote class="tr_bq"><div><span style="font-family: 'Trebuchet MS',Arial,Helvetica,sans-serif;"><span style="line-height: 23px;"><span style="font-size: 18px;"> I interpret that to mean that when you called me ... we were both being broadcast on your radio show and you did not mention that. If we were being broadcast ... and I was led to believe that your call was a private conversation ... isn't that illegal? Aren't you supposed to ask me if I want to be on your show?</span></span></span></div><div><span style="font-family: 'Trebuchet MS',Arial,Helvetica,sans-serif;"><span style="line-height: 23px;"><span style="font-size: 18px;"><br />
</span></span></span></div><div><span style="font-family: 'Trebuchet MS',Arial,Helvetica,sans-serif;"><span style="line-height: 23px;"><span style="font-size: 18px;"> In addition Orly Taitz and Jerome Corsi were both informed of my feeling that part of the "different typeface" evidence may be flawed as a result of my understanding of Woodman's findings ... prior to your call. Some of it is still correct ... but I informed them that I had lost complete confidence in the evidence and would not support it if required to testify ... but would rely on the new evidence that was already available to them at the time ... but not published by WND yet ... and I would give it to you now but I don't want to "scoop" mr. Corsi or WND.</span></span></span></div><div><span style="font-family: 'Trebuchet MS',Arial,Helvetica,sans-serif;"><span style="line-height: 23px;"><span style="font-size: 18px;"><br />
</span></span></span></div><div><span style="font-family: 'Trebuchet MS',Arial,Helvetica,sans-serif;"><span style="line-height: 23px;"><span style="font-size: 18px;"> So in addition to the text in blue below this ... you should publish the entire text of what I have just said here ... and if possible publish the JFK poster attached. I think that otherwise it is easy to assume that I am a kook for making my claims ... which I did not make to you without these supportive statements and they should be included at your website for your readers to consider.</span></span></span></div><div><span style="font-family: 'Trebuchet MS',Arial,Helvetica,sans-serif;"><span style="line-height: 23px;"><span style="font-size: 18px;"><br />
</span></span></span></div><div><span style="font-family: 'Trebuchet MS',Arial,Helvetica,sans-serif;"><span style="line-height: 23px;"><span style="font-size: 18px;">Paul Irey </span></span></span></div></blockquote>[Editorial comment:<br />
<br />
Mr. Irey was confused by the following article which linked to a blog post by Doctor Conspiracy: <a href="http://beforeitsnews.com/story/1569/302/Paul_Irey_backtracks.html">Before It's News: Paul Irey Backtracks</a><br />
<br />
The comment that Mr. Irey attributed to me was actually made by Doc C who referenced his call to RC Radio on my program on June 23, 2011. I neither recorded nor broadcast my call to Paul Irey in November that is the basis for the previous article on this blog.<br />
<br />
I am also publishing the poster that Mr. Irey sent me on the Kennedy assassination. <b>Warning: This content is very graphic.</b>]<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;"><a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEhRhZMYfLBLzpJ_1Tbtclu0Mh50-xB-WEO-Srs06kb6pfCiBpjQr44R26U598M0tBFW9BjZ_1tAxlDLQdYfue2EIhDpcl_LbtfQBK3gGg6qnRHrksjjMpE6PEeL2MEYhrabfHR1O8xQMQf0/s1600/JFK+POSTER+proof.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" height="400" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEhRhZMYfLBLzpJ_1Tbtclu0Mh50-xB-WEO-Srs06kb6pfCiBpjQr44R26U598M0tBFW9BjZ_1tAxlDLQdYfue2EIhDpcl_LbtfQBK3gGg6qnRHrksjjMpE6PEeL2MEYhrabfHR1O8xQMQf0/s400/JFK+POSTER+proof.jpg" width="321" /></a></div>Reality Checkhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/00126783152381564733noreply@blogger.com16tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7267011437681190669.post-36653289502735052932011-12-01T09:10:00.001-05:002011-12-01T09:12:33.095-05:00A Conversation with Paul Irey<table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" class="tr-caption-container" style="float: left; margin-right: 1em; text-align: left;"><tbody>
<tr><td style="text-align: center;"><a href="http://www.wnd.com/images/misc/060711PaulIrey.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="clear: left; margin-bottom: 1em; margin-left: auto; margin-right: auto;"><img border="0" height="200" src="http://www.wnd.com/images/misc/060711PaulIrey.jpg" width="156" /></a></td></tr>
<tr><td class="tr-caption" style="text-align: center;">Paul Irey</td></tr>
</tbody></table><br />
<span style="font-size: small;">I </span>called Paul Irey last week to invite him to appear on Reality Check Radio to debate John Woodman on the authenticity of the Obama long from birth certificate. Irey has declared it to be a forgery beyond doubt. Mr. Irey’s <a href="http://www.wnd.com/?pageId=308397">claims </a>are based on differences in typefaces and other anomalies among various letters in the document. In his book, <a href="http://www.amazon.com/Barack-Obamas-Birth-Certificate-Fraud/dp/0983759251/ref=ntt_at_ep_dpt_1">Is Obama’s Birth Certificate a Fraud?: A Computer Guy Examines The Evidence For Forgery</a>, John Woodman devoted an entire chapter to Mr. Irey’s claims and found them to be easily refuted. John Woodman has publicly challenged Paul Irey to debate him but Mr. Irey has refused. I thought I would offer a fair forum to them where a full two hours could be devoted to a debate but unfortunately Mr. Irey still refuses. Mr. Irey was kind enough to be a guest on my show earlier this year and I had hoped he would consider a return for what could be an interesting evening. <br />
<div class="MsoNormal"><br />
</div><div class="MsoNormal">Mr. Irey and I touched on a number of topics and the conversation while civil did become heated at times. Irey concedes that John Woodman has found some major flaws in his original analysis. Namely, Woodman demonstrated that many of the letters that Irey chose to blow up for comparison are from a vertical section of the document where it appears that the copier or scanner caused a distortion. Irey concedes that Woodman is correct. <b>Irey also said that he has sent an email to Orly Taitz, Jerome Corsi, Doug Vogt, and others advising them of the problems with his analysis and asking them not to use it.</b> I was startled to hear this and told Mr. Irey I had never seen a single retraction printed anywhere. I told him that this hasn’t stopped Taitz from including it with her motions in several court cases and in her challenge presented to the Ballot Law Commission in New Hampshire last month. Irey offered two explanations why he was not that concerned to have his flawed analysis submitted as evidence. First he says he is still sure the birth certificate is forged because a source he will not name from the Secret Service told him in 2008 that Obama was not born in Hawaii. Second, he is working on a new analysis that will be published soon (one would assume in World Net Daily) that will be “irrefutable”. He also said it didn’t matter because no judge had read them anyway. I suspect Irey is correct that no judge has ever really read his gobbledygook but no real expert would dare let work that he would not endorse be filed in any court.</div><div class="MsoNormal"><br />
</div><div class="MsoNormal">I asked Mr. Irey if he was concerned that two administrations in Hawaii had vouched for the validity of both the 2008 COLB and the 2011 long form birth certificate and that Dr. Fukino, Loretta Fuddy, and Alvin Onaka had all staked their professional reputations on those documents. Irey replied that “Fuddy and Onaka would both be going to jail” for their complicity in the forgery. I told him that I would bet him $500 that neither of them would go to jail by a date one year from our conversation. Irey would not take the bet. (My offer still stands by the way.)</div><div class="MsoNormal"><br />
</div><div class="MsoNormal">I then asked Irey how he could explain other additional evidence of that Barack Obama was born in Hawaii. These included the contemporary newspaper accounts, recollections by Obama’s teacher Barbara Nelson, and the passport records for Ann Dunham that showed that an official from the state department had investigated the Obama child’s place of birth. Irey was familiar with these but dismissed them all. He said Barbara Nelson was lying and that the newspaper announcements were the result of Obama’s grandmother filing for a birth certificate after the Obamas returned from Kenya. Irey said he remembered reading that there was a Hawaii law that allowed one to get a birth certificate that said the birth place was Hawaii even though the birth occurred elsewhere. He could not quote the statute. He said that was done for a Chinese communist but he could not remember the name. I am sure Irey was referring to the birth certificate issued by the Territory of Hawaii in 1904 for Sun Yat-sen. Dr. Conspiracy and others have written about this fraudulent birth certificate oft cited by Birthers as proof that anyone can get birth certificate in Hawaii with merely a signature of a relative. No other certificate other than this one from 1904 has ever been produced although Orly Taitz and others have maintained it is easy to obtain a birth certificate that shows a Hawaiian birth with a mere signature of a relative. </div><div class="MsoNormal"><br />
</div><div class="MsoNormal">Irey also buys into Larry Sinclair’s cockamamie stories. I will not delve into the details but let’s just say Irey is very familiar with all the details and believes Obama is bisexual and met male lovers at Rev. Wright’s church. He had several of them killed according to Irey. He buys into other conspiracy theories too: Did you know that all the major news outlets have their news stories verified daily by the government? Mr. Irey says that this began in 1947 under the Truman administration and continues to this day. </div><div class="MsoNormal"><br />
</div><div class="MsoNormal">Paul Irey’s hobby of delving into conspiracy theories goes back a long way. If you talk to him for very long he will always get around to the Kennedy assassination. He believes the fatal shot was fired from a sewer in front of the limousine and that the famous autopsy photo showing little damage to Kennedy’s face cannot be reconciled with the Zapruder film. He believes the driver of the limousine slowed the vehicle intentionally at the right moment to allow the unknown assassin to take the fatal shot. I did not want to engage him on the Kennedy assassination details. We recently passed the 48 year anniversary of the assassination and I have seen every conspiracy on the assignation debunked to at least my satisfaction. I see no point at spending time on it. </div><div class="MsoNormal"><br />
</div><div class="MsoNormal">I am convinced that Paul Irey is sincere in his beliefs. He might even be a pleasant guy to meet but he lives in a different world than most of us. He trusts no one and wakes up every day sure that unknown sinister forces are controlling every aspect of government and the media. Like most conspiracy theorists he always invokes the shadowy “they” to toss out mountains of evidence for which he has no explanation. For that I pity him. However, that in no way excuses the fact that he has allowed his so-called “evidence” that he knows is flawed to be used by charlatans like Orly Taitz and Jerome Corsi to convince their gullible followers and readers that the President is a liar. </div><div class="MsoNormal"><br />
</div>Reality Checkhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/00126783152381564733noreply@blogger.com14tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7267011437681190669.post-30091488391738124722011-11-21T09:04:00.002-05:002011-11-21T09:08:23.969-05:00New Hampshire to Taitz: Take your nutiness back to La-La LandLast week Orly Taitz finally got to put her stack of "zibits" and "dossies" before an honest to goodness official venue. On November 18 Taitz appeared for nearly a full hour before the New Hampshire Ballot Access Commission. The Commission held a hearing on four challenges to candidates for the January first in the nation presidential primary election. Taitz had filed her challenge against President Barack Obama based on her so called "evidence" of a forged Hawaiian birth certificate, social security fraud, and a wrong headed interpretation of the Constitutional definition of "natural born citizen". Taitz gave a 30 minute disjointed presentation and cross examined the single witness called by the commission, Assistant Secretary of State Ms. Karen Ladd. Taitz's challenge was scheduled to be heard last but as is the norm for Taitz she asked and received special treatment from the commission to accommodate her "busy schedule" and move her top the top of the list of challenges to be heard. <br />
<br />
The bipartisan commission apparently was not swayed by Taitz and the testimony of several other supporters including one former and several current Republican state representatives. After a very short discussion they voted 5 - 0 to reject the challenge. <br />
<br />
RC Radio again provided same day coverage of the hearing with a great account provided by The Fogbow Forum member, Whatever4. It may be downloaded here: <a href="http://www.blogtalkradio.com/rcr/2011/11/19/rc-radio--the-nuts-in-new-hampshire-special-edition.mp3">RC Radio: The Nut's in New Hampshire Special Edition</a>. A special thanks to W4 and to Sterngard who asked most of the questions during the interview.<br />
<br />
A complete video of the hearing was posted by a Taitz supporter, Tim Carter:<br />
<br />
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;"><iframe allowfullscreen='allowfullscreen' webkitallowfullscreen='webkitallowfullscreen' mozallowfullscreen='mozallowfullscreen' width='320' height='266' src='https://www.youtube.com/embed/BUcyb5pmUKI?feature=player_embedded' frameborder='0'></iframe></div><br />
One very telling moment came at the end of Taitz presentation when the Commission Chairman Bradford Cook (R) asked Taitz if she had any real evidence other that innuendo and opinion and Taitz said "No". What I found disturbing was the reaction to the defeat by supporters of Orly Tatiz. They accosted the counsel for the Secretary of State following the ruling. They accused the members of the Commission of committing treason. Some of these accusers include several current state representatives. Here is another video that documents the reactions of Susan Delemus and Harry Accornero both Republican members of the legislature.<br />
<br />
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;"><iframe allowfullscreen='allowfullscreen' webkitallowfullscreen='webkitallowfullscreen' mozallowfullscreen='mozallowfullscreen' width='320' height='266' src='https://www.youtube.com/embed/A81NrRwi6cA?feature=player_embedded' frameborder='0'></iframe></div><br />
A written transcript of Whatever4's recollection of the hearing is also available at Jack Ryan's SCRIBD page:<br />
<br />
<a href="http://www.scribd.com/doc/73157849/NEW-HAMPSHIRE-BALLOT-CHALLENGE-HEARING-REPORT-11-18-11-As-Reported-by-Whatever4-of-The-Fogbow" style="-x-system-font: none; display: block; font-family: Helvetica,Arial,Sans-serif; font-size-adjust: none; font-size: 14px; font-stretch: normal; font-style: normal; font-variant: normal; font-weight: normal; line-height: normal; margin: 12px auto 6px auto; text-decoration: underline;" title="View NEW HAMPSHIRE BALLOT CHALLENGE HEARING REPORT - 11-18-11 - As Reported by Whatever4 of The Fogbow on Scribd">NEW HAMPSHIRE BALLOT CHALLENGE HEARING REPORT - 11-18-11 - As Reported by Whatever4 of The Fogbow</a><iframe class="scribd_iframe_embed" data-aspect-ratio="0.772727272727273" data-auto-height="true" frameborder="0" height="600" id="doc_27737" scrolling="no" src="http://www.scribd.com/embeds/73157849/content?start_page=1&view_mode=list&access_key=key-vrveekak08fwkiyhxwn" width="100%"></iframe><script type="text/javascript">
(function() { var scribd = document.createElement("script"); scribd.type = "text/javascript"; scribd.async = true; scribd.src = "http://www.scribd.com/javascripts/embed_code/inject.js"; var s = document.getElementsByTagName("script")[0]; s.parentNode.insertBefore(scribd, s); })();
</script>Reality Checkhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/00126783152381564733noreply@blogger.com5tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7267011437681190669.post-2014219983406774972011-11-14T21:33:00.000-05:002011-11-14T21:33:14.990-05:00Reality Check Radio Is Changing Nights!RC Radio is moving to Tuesday night at 8:30 PM EST beginning tomorrow night. Be sure and tune in for the same Birther smackdowns.Reality Checkhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/00126783152381564733noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7267011437681190669.post-45808900016453167632011-10-09T21:44:00.012-04:002012-01-05T22:21:47.223-05:00Jerome Corsi, Paul Irey, and Lucas Smith team up to shoot themselves in the foot<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;"><a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEjwulpIWfNdJ_yks2D8ZLxIPQY4cQfCGxnPu2ujOaIVo2ysnFKE88T7UyGR4PP-_83McEkn3L1eq1MnNfBLui0tQvcG_XrgIPyO5tpP4pJ-RE5P4ce9R8ehevPR28IseNxWVKXUgJEpa1lk/s400/130-224~The-Three-Stooges-Posters.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="clear: left; float: left; margin-bottom: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" height="156" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEjwulpIWfNdJ_yks2D8ZLxIPQY4cQfCGxnPu2ujOaIVo2ysnFKE88T7UyGR4PP-_83McEkn3L1eq1MnNfBLui0tQvcG_XrgIPyO5tpP4pJ-RE5P4ce9R8ehevPR28IseNxWVKXUgJEpa1lk/s200/130-224~The-Three-Stooges-Posters.jpg" width="200" /></a></div>Okay, bear with me, this one will take a bit of explanation. Remember the WND article by Jerome Corsi titled <a href="http://www.wnd.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&pageId=342937">How does Obama's document stack up against a genuine BC? </a> that was publsihed last month in which Paul Irey analyzed the fonts on a previously unpublished Hawaiian birth certificate from August 1961? Irey tried to show that this birth certificate had more consistent typewritten fonts than did the Obama LFBC. Irey's font voodoo is irrelevant and has been completely debunked by John Woodman in his book <a href="http://www.obamabirthbook.com/get-obama-birth-certificate-book/"><i><b>Is Barack Obama’s Birth Certificate a Fraud?</b></i></a> and by others.<a href="http://rcradioshow.blogspot.com/p/paul-irey-and-doug-vogts-incredible.html"> (Including this author.)</a><br />
<br />
In Corsi's article a highly redacted birth certificate of a female born in Honolulu on August 23, 1961 was presented as an example of a "genuine" Hawaii long form birth certificate. (No additional proof was provided that this was a genuine document other than a photo of the seal and signature of Registrar Alvin Onaka just as appears on the Obama LFBC. Other than that we are left to take Corsi's word for it since the names and addresses were all redacted.) To any sane person this new birth certificate was a curiosity and if anything supported the authenticity of the Obama LFBC for several reasons. It confirmed that the name of the hospital was really Kapi'olani Maternity & Gynecological Hospital in 1961 just as appeared on the Obama LFBC. The signature of the local registrar, V. K. L. Lee is there as it was on the Obama certificate. The form was exactly the same. However, once a commenter or two on WND pointed out these items a new even more redacted image was substituted in the article that removed the name of the hospital and Lee's signature for whatever reason. <br />
<br />
<table align="center" cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" class="tr-caption-container" style="margin-left: auto; margin-right: auto; text-align: center;"><tbody>
<tr><td style="text-align: center;"><a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEgUf7AIWXf2K7qM2GYWvpxG3phNsM1AvRjstsOSYaQVJtnC4BcIhbkXHKLPUcq65jIXRefepDypLQYkVJkjApDemb8mf7Vtk8Oz_4qHd-UTKFVjMwfG9mgDEtzR8jvp0GeRNKI5j_-I1PUC/s1600/090811AuthenticBC+Original.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: auto; margin-right: auto;"><img border="0" height="261" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEgUf7AIWXf2K7qM2GYWvpxG3phNsM1AvRjstsOSYaQVJtnC4BcIhbkXHKLPUcq65jIXRefepDypLQYkVJkjApDemb8mf7Vtk8Oz_4qHd-UTKFVjMwfG9mgDEtzR8jvp0GeRNKI5j_-I1PUC/s320/090811AuthenticBC+Original.jpg" width="320" /></a></td></tr>
<tr><td class="tr-caption" style="text-align: center;">WND Mystery BC front side as originally posted</td></tr>
</tbody></table><br />
<table align="center" cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" class="tr-caption-container" style="margin-left: auto; margin-right: auto; text-align: center;"><tbody>
<tr><td style="text-align: center;"><a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEiw_kK2x7T_kwhIBK_gVuF4inhIWrfGUO0exCTVQTiPmQMfk85wIy6dLdyeo6HeuCljc3xjJc-4R0kvT2AG13kNccqj5LfWBDJXGZwspebv2fg8b_HwECavqxbKyYH0cJE0QabGO9jXFt_O/s1600/Irey+BC.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: auto; margin-right: auto;"><img border="0" height="261" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEiw_kK2x7T_kwhIBK_gVuF4inhIWrfGUO0exCTVQTiPmQMfk85wIy6dLdyeo6HeuCljc3xjJc-4R0kvT2AG13kNccqj5LfWBDJXGZwspebv2fg8b_HwECavqxbKyYH0cJE0QabGO9jXFt_O/s320/Irey+BC.jpg" width="320" /></a></td></tr>
<tr><td class="tr-caption" style="text-align: center;">WND Mystery BC - back side</td></tr>
</tbody></table><table align="center" cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" class="tr-caption-container" style="margin-left: auto; margin-right: auto; text-align: center;"><tbody>
<tr><td style="text-align: center;"><a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEitZdk5AN9TGHBsxRf0WC9qX-s9UmpNgI7-5AGs2ozt3yiyJSS_211pYpMT1camz1duj5f3_fvtZv0zCpxdtE1l09vU8LFZWGOyUePAUmZFZIScjjAFcc_6UipPH0s1KFvwCuoKbGqoNmnp/s1600/091311frontimportant.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: auto; margin-right: auto;"><img border="0" height="265" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEitZdk5AN9TGHBsxRf0WC9qX-s9UmpNgI7-5AGs2ozt3yiyJSS_211pYpMT1camz1duj5f3_fvtZv0zCpxdtE1l09vU8LFZWGOyUePAUmZFZIScjjAFcc_6UipPH0s1KFvwCuoKbGqoNmnp/s320/091311frontimportant.jpg" width="320" /></a></td></tr>
<tr><td class="tr-caption" style="text-align: center;">WND Mystery BC with additional redaction</td></tr>
</tbody></table><br />
<br />
What turned out to be the real gem in the article was a seemingly innocuous scan of the back side of the "mystery birth certificate". John Woodman enhanced the contrast of the image, flipped it using photo editing software and determined that some of the redacted data from the front of the document was visible. The most interesting bit of this data was the birth certificate number. It ended in the digits "09945". When compared to previously published birth certificates from August 1961 we noticed that the number for Miss X born on August 23 was almost 700 lower than Barack Obama's (10641) and the Nordyke twins (10637 & 10638). The certificate number for the Waidelich BC was 10920. Stig Waidelich was born on August 5. I know this is a bit nerdy but for those who follow this stuff believe me it was significant and blew a huge hole in the conspiracy theories about the Obama certificate number that have been pushed by birthers since the release of the short form in 2008.<br />
<br />
<table align="center" cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" class="tr-caption-container" style="margin-left: auto; margin-right: auto; text-align: center;"><tbody>
<tr><td style="text-align: center;"><a href="http://www.obamabirthbook.com/wp-content/uploads/WND-AUG-23-3.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: auto; margin-right: auto;"><img border="0" height="86" src="http://www.obamabirthbook.com/wp-content/uploads/WND-AUG-23-3.jpg" width="320" /></a></td></tr>
<tr><td class="tr-caption" style="text-align: center;">"Mystery BC - Certificate number discovered by John Woodman</td></tr>
</tbody></table><br />
Some folks thought they could make out the some the names on the "mystery birth certificate" but not conclusively. The best guess was that the last name began with "A" and the mother's name was Theresa Pxxxxx. <br />
<br />
With that, the story went dormant. WND buried the Corsi article in the archive and Irey dodged a proposed debate with John Woodman. Then entered he, Lucas Daniel Smith ....<br />
<br />
Lucas Smith left a comment on an article at Doc Conspiracy's blog with a link to a new article on Smith's blog. Smith's rambling article contained some juicy details of the sexual trysts between Orly Taitz and Charles Lincoln III at a house occupied by Lincoln, Peyton Yates Freiman, and Lucas Smith in 2009 when Taitz brought in Lucas Smith to testify concerning the POSFKBC before Judge Carter in <i>Barnett v Obama </i>in September 2009. Smith ultimately never appeared on the stand in that case. In the article Smith also published copies of the Obama birth announcement in the <i>Honolulu Advertiser</i> obtained by Smith's pal Gary Ronhovde from the California State Library microfilm collection in October 2009. The Obama announcement had previously been published by at least two sources from both the archives of the <i>Honolulu Start Bulletin</i> and the one from the library in California. However, what was new in Smith's article was copies of the birth announcements for almost every day in August 1961. (Now I warned you this wasn't simple.)<br />
<br />
<a href="http://www.blogger.com/goog_1449187711">Birth announcements from August 1961</a><i><a href="http://www.scribd.com/doc/67946205/Honolulu-Advertiser-newspaper-birth-announcements-for-the-following-days-of-August-1961-3-4-5-6-7-8-13-14-15-16-17-18-19-20-21-22"> Honolulu Advertiser. </a></i><br />
<br />
On page 37 of the <i>Advertiser </i>birth records that Smith posted is an entry for a baby daughter of Mr. and Mrs. James K. Ah'Nee born on August 23. Aha! or Ah Nee! This was the mystery Miss X from the WND article. Credit goes to Gorefan at ObamaConspiracy.org for noticing this tidbit of information. Now when we look at the certificate numbers we find a pattern:<br />
<br />
<span style="color: red;">[Edited January 5, 2012 to include the Virginia Sunahara BC]</span><br />
<br />
Ah’Nee – 09945 – August 23rd, Accepted/Filed August 24th<br />
Nordyke, Susan – 10637 – August 5th, Accepted/Filed August 11th<br />
Nordyke, Gretchen – 10638 – August 5th, Accepted/Filed August 11th <br />
Obama, Barack – 10641 – August 4th, Accepted/Filed August 8th<br />
<span style="color: red;">Sunahara, Virginia* - 11080 - August 4th, Accepted/Filed August 10th</span><br />
Waidelich, Stig – 10920 – August 5th/Accepted/Filed August 8th<br />
<br />
<span style="color: red;">* Not verified</span> <br />
<br />
If it looks to you as if they were assigned alphabetically in monthly batches give yourself a pat on the back. Doc C proposed just such a theory when the Waidelich birth certificate number was captured by this author from CNN's AC360 show last April. The Ah'Nee certificate supports that theory very well. The number of births per month in Hawaii in <a href="http://www.nber.org/vital-statistics/historical/nat61_1.CV.pdf">1961 </a>(page 205) was around 1400 so the spread in the certificate numbers from Ah'Nee to Waidelich of 974 appears reasonable.<br />
<br />
I did a little additional research and I believe that the name of the holder of the birth certificate is Johanna Ah-Nee Randolph of Mililani, HI and the parents names were James K. and Theresa Pukaua Ah-Nee. One has to wonder how Jerome Corsi or Paul Irey obtained a copy of this birth certificate. Did Corsi have a copy of the <i>Advertiser </i>birth announcements? Did he or Irey contact people until they found someone who would supply a copy? Regardless, it shows the intensity with which the Birthers like Corsi have invested their time and money into attempts to discredit President Obama. However, once again the efforts have blown up in their faces. <br />
<br />
What are the morals of the story? First, any time Birthers attempt to do real research they debunk their own theories. Second, don't trust your private documents to amateurs like Jerome Corsi and Paul Irey.Reality Checkhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/00126783152381564733noreply@blogger.com1tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7267011437681190669.post-66240374311256008582011-10-01T09:30:00.004-04:002011-10-01T09:41:01.181-04:00John Woodman: Paul Irey will not debate me because Jerome Corsi might not like it<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;"><a href="http://obamabirthbook.com/wp-content/uploads/is-barack-obamas-birth-certificate-a-fraud-book.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="clear: left; float: left; margin-bottom: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" height="200" src="http://obamabirthbook.com/wp-content/uploads/is-barack-obamas-birth-certificate-a-fraud-book.jpg" width="150" /></a></div>John Woodman returned as my guest on RC Radio last Thursday night. He said that Paul Irey who had initially seemed open to debating him on a national radio show had changed his mind after reading portions of the book (we assume that would have included Mr. Woodman's debunking of Irey's own assertions about the LFBC). He also said Mr. Irey told him that Dr. Jerome Corsi might not like if he debated John. That is a remarkable statement from someone who boldly accuses the President of publishing a fraudulent document and claims the can prove it beyond any doubt. Why would Paul Irey take his marching orders from Jerome Corsi and World Net Daily?<br />
<br />
John Woodman also expanded his <a href="http://www.obamabirthbook.com/http:/www.obamabirthbook.com/2011/09/i-challenge-paul-irey-to-a-public-debate-in-the-largest-possible-venue/">debate challenge</a> to include Jerome Corsi and any or all of his stable of so-called "experts" including Mara Zebest and Douglas Vogt.<br />
<br />
I say let's bring it on! <a href="http://www.blogtalkradio.com/rcr">RC Radio</a> joins in the challenge and would provide time to host such a debate on a future program.Reality Checkhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/00126783152381564733noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7267011437681190669.post-74955610182392747502011-09-26T10:20:00.000-04:002011-09-26T10:20:25.117-04:00Irey vs. Woodman Debate?<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;"></div><div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;"></div><table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" class="tr-caption-container" style="float: left; margin-right: 1em; text-align: left;"><tbody>
<tr><td style="text-align: center;"><a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEj4lJbhdOwtBQOfc42f7z4FsGcJjNrePj_6D_rmxadcus40K24Wy08Z9OL5DJeC1ltG19dfult7eJIohF0Y384LWr-CIJKCvZQ_Wx-Yaezrt8OTMqh2AoG379zUP6taAZnGGVUxkPrsj8eS/s1600/woodman-irey.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="clear: left; margin-bottom: 1em; margin-left: auto; margin-right: auto;"><img border="0" height="209" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEj4lJbhdOwtBQOfc42f7z4FsGcJjNrePj_6D_rmxadcus40K24Wy08Z9OL5DJeC1ltG19dfult7eJIohF0Y384LWr-CIJKCvZQ_Wx-Yaezrt8OTMqh2AoG379zUP6taAZnGGVUxkPrsj8eS/s320/woodman-irey.jpg" width="320" /></a></td></tr>
<tr><td class="tr-caption" style="text-align: center;"> Paul Irey John Woodman</td></tr>
</tbody></table><br />
John Woodman, author of the recently published book <a href="http://www.obamabirthbook.com/get-obama-birth-certificate-book/">Is Barack Obama's Birth Certificate a Fraud?</a> has issued a challenged to Paul Irey to debate him concerning Irey's analysis of the typing on the Obama LFBC. The challenge was issued by Mr. Woodman in a post on his <a href="http://www.obamabirthbook.com/http:/www.obamabirthbook.com/2011/09/i-challenge-paul-irey-to-a-public-debate-in-the-largest-possible-venue/">blog</a>. No answer has been posted to date so we may assume that Mr. Irey has either declined or discussions are ongoing. While RC Radio would be happy to host such a debate, and could offer a full two hours for it to be conducted, Mr. Woodman suggested that one of the larger national radio shows be contacted once the parties agree to the debate. <br />
<br />
Paul Irey was one of the two self proclaimed "experts" that accompanied Orly Taitz to Hawaii in August in her unsuccessful attempt to view the "vault copy" of President Obama's long form birth certificate. The other "expert" was Doug Vogt. Mr. Vogt has been invited to be a guest on Reality Check Radio but has not responded to a couple of requests. RC Radio would like to invite Mr. Vogt and Mr. Woodman to engage in a debate on a future show.Reality Checkhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/00126783152381564733noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7267011437681190669.post-59900772012693023462011-09-01T08:05:00.000-04:002011-09-01T08:05:44.032-04:00John Woodman, Springfield Computer Guy will Be on RC Radio 9/1<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;"><a href="http://photo.goodreads.com/books/1311495344l/12118783.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="clear: left; float: left; margin-bottom: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" height="200" src="http://photo.goodreads.com/books/1311495344l/12118783.jpg" width="133" /></a></div>John Woodman, the author of the recently released book, <a href="http://www.amazon.com/Barack-Obamas-Birth-Certificate-Fraud/dp/0983759251/ref=sr_1_1?s=books&ie=UTF8&qid=1314877791&sr=1-1">Is Barack Obama's Birth Certificate a Fraud?</a>, will be my guest tonight on RC Radio. John Woodman is a conservative who posted a series of videos on YouTube as Springfield Computer Guy who analyzed several claims that the Obama long form birth certificate was forged and found them to be not proof of a forgery at all. In the book Woodman takes on such "experts" as Karl Denninger, Douglas Vogt, and Paul Irey and finds all of their theories are full of holes.<br />
<br />
Mike Dunford will also be on the show to update us on the latest action with Orly Taitz in Hawaii district court. <br />
<br />
To listen use this link: <a href="http://www.blogtalkradio.com/rcr/2011/09/02/reality-check-radio">RC Radio </a>You can also call (347) 324-5546 to listen or ask a question. Reality Checkhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/00126783152381564733noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7267011437681190669.post-21658763897634993722011-08-27T11:45:00.008-04:002011-09-10T11:27:27.070-04:00Chief Judge allows Orly to "phone it in" [Updated]*<table align="center" cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" class="tr-caption-container" style="float: left; margin-right: 1em; text-align: left;"><tbody>
<tr><td style="text-align: center;"><a href="http://cache.abovethelaw.com/uploads/2010/07/Susan-Oki-Mollway-Chief-Judge-Mollway.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: auto; margin-right: auto;"><img border="0" src="http://cache.abovethelaw.com/uploads/2010/07/Susan-Oki-Mollway-Chief-Judge-Mollway.jpg" /></a></td></tr>
<tr><td class="tr-caption" style="text-align: center;">Judge Susan Oki Mollway</td></tr>
</tbody></table><strike>In an unusual move the chief judge of the federal district court in Hawaii, Susan Mollway, has ordered the world's worst attorney Orly Taitz to appear in her court room next Tuesday at a hearing on a motion for ECF filer status that Taiz submitted. The granting of ECF access privileges is normally a routine matter that can be handled with a simple submission of an application but Judge Mollway has decided that she wants to have Taitz appear in person to defend the application. We can only speculate why such an unusual hearing has been scheduled. Maybe the courts are finally catching on to Orly and her traveling freak show? One can only hope!</strike><br />
<br />
<strike>It appears that Taitz will have to turn right around and travel back to the Aloha State in the near future for a hearing scheduled on September 14 in the Taitz v Astrue case. All these trips to Hawaii must be putting a dent in her flying monkeys' frequent flyer mile accounts.</strike><br />
<strike><br />
</strike><br />
[See update below]<br />
<br />
This is not Judge Mollway's first case dealing with birth certificates and the procedures followed by the Department of Health. She recently dismissed a case filed by a clerk for another Judge in the Ninth Circuit of all people. The case filed by Adam Gustafson and his wife was over a requirement that the parents race be provided on the birth certificate application. Judge Mollway was not impressed with the suit and made this comment in her dismissal: <br />
<br />
<blockquote><i>"This case is an example of why people who overreact to situations are accused of “making a federal case out of nothing.'</i><br />
<br />
<i>Plaintiff Adam Gustafson and his wife… proceed pro se against various state officials. The Gustafsons complain about having been asked to state their race and any Spanish origin on a birth certificate registration form submitted in October 2009 for their Hawaii-born daughter. The Gustafsons articulated to the State their objection to a birth certificate identifying their races.</i><br />
<br />
<i>The court has no quarrel with the Gustafsons’ wish for a birth certificate devoid of such information. What follows, though, shows questionable judgment."</i></blockquote>Did you catch that first sentence, Orly? Could this is a clue as to why Judge Mollway has taken an interest in Orly's case? David Lat has a good article on the Gustafson v Fukino case at <a href="http://abovethelaw.com/2010/07/lawsuit-of-the-day-fun-with-hawaii-birth-certificates/">Above the Law</a>.<br />
<br />
In other news in the Taitz v Astrue case State of Hawaii Deputy AG Jill Nagamine has filed a response to Taitz motion to compel her subpoena of vital records held by the Department of Health. The response contained the key flaws in Taitz' subpoenas that several posters at the Fogbow have pointed out repeatedly:<br />
<ol><li>Taitz failed to properly serve Director Fuddy</li>
<li>Even if one assumed proper service Hawaii laws prevent the state from granting Taitz access to the vital records</li>
<li>Obama's birth certificate has nothing to do with a FOIA case asking for social security records. </li>
</ol>The response also included a copy of the letter that the representative of the Department of Health, Keith Yamamoto, handed to Taitz on August 8th. Stay tuned to RC Radio for future action.<br />
<br />
Response:<br />
<br />
<a href="http://www.scribd.com/doc/63062252/TAITZ-v-ASTRUE-USDC-HI-9-0-MEMORANDUM-in-Opposition-to-Plaintiff-s-Emergency-Ex-Parte-Motion-Gov-uscourts-hid-98529-9-0" style="-x-system-font: none; display: block; font-family: Helvetica,Arial,Sans-serif; font-size-adjust: none; font-size: 14px; font-stretch: normal; font-style: normal; font-variant: normal; font-weight: normal; line-height: normal; margin: 12px auto 6px auto; text-decoration: underline;" title="View TAITZ v ASTRUE (USDC HI) - 9.0 - MEMORANDUM in Opposition to Plaintiff's Emergency Ex-Parte Motion - Gov.uscourts.hid.98529.9.0 on Scribd">TAITZ v ASTRUE (USDC HI) - 9.0 - MEMORANDUM in Opposition to Plaintiff's Emergency Ex-Parte Motion - Gov.us...</a><iframe class="scribd_iframe_embed" data-aspect-ratio="0.772727272727273" data-auto-height="true" frameborder="0" height="600" id="doc_157" scrolling="no" src="http://www.scribd.com/embeds/63062252/content?start_page=1&view_mode=list&access_key=key-ydtpxb6nl7x0sd35slc" width="100%"></iframe><script type="text/javascript">
(function() { var scribd = document.createElement("script"); scribd.type = "text/javascript"; scribd.async = true; scribd.src = "http://www.scribd.com/javascripts/embed_code/inject.js"; var s = document.getElementsByTagName("script")[0]; s.parentNode.insertBefore(scribd, s); })();
</script><br />
<br />
Letter:<br />
<br />
<a href="http://www.scribd.com/doc/63062828/TAITZ-v-ASTRUE-USDC-HI-9-3-3-Exhibit-Exhibit-A-Gov-uscourts-hid-98529-9-3" style="-x-system-font: none; display: block; font-family: Helvetica,Arial,Sans-serif; font-size-adjust: none; font-size: 14px; font-stretch: normal; font-style: normal; font-variant: normal; font-weight: normal; line-height: normal; margin: 12px auto 6px auto; text-decoration: underline;" title="View TAITZ v ASTRUE (USDC HI) - 9.3 - # 3 Exhibit Exhibit A - Gov.uscourts.hid.98529.9.3 on Scribd">TAITZ v ASTRUE (USDC HI) - 9.3 - # 3 Exhibit Exhibit A - Gov.uscourts.hid.98529.9.3</a><iframe class="scribd_iframe_embed" data-aspect-ratio="0.772875816993464" data-auto-height="true" frameborder="0" height="600" id="doc_53726" scrolling="no" src="http://www.scribd.com/embeds/63062828/content?start_page=1&view_mode=slideshow&access_key=key-oivsomhs5n19izi652v" width="100%"></iframe><script type="text/javascript">
(function() { var scribd = document.createElement("script"); scribd.type = "text/javascript"; scribd.async = true; scribd.src = "http://www.scribd.com/javascripts/embed_code/inject.js"; var s = document.getElementsByTagName("script")[0]; s.parentNode.insertBefore(scribd, s); })();
</script><br />
<br />
* [Updated 8/28/2011] Orly now claims that she will join the hearing via telephone. We speculated as such on RC Radio the other night. Nothing on the docket reflects the change but we will know Tuesday. <br />
[Updated 9/10/2011] Judge Mollway did indeed allow Taitz to call into the hearing. A <a href="http://www.scribd.com/doc/63842636/TAITZ-v-ASTRUE-USDC-HI-OFFICIAL-TRANSCRIPT-8-30-11-HEARING">transcript </a>of the hearing is available. Taitz's original claim from the hearing that Judge Mollway granted her ECF filer status during the hearing proved to be incorrect. Judge Mollway merely pointed Orly to the web site where she could apply for the privilege.Reality Checkhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/00126783152381564733noreply@blogger.com6tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7267011437681190669.post-16268963769607336472011-08-22T10:48:00.005-04:002011-08-22T18:17:11.190-04:00Random Thoughts on Birtherism<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;"><a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEigeJ2i5wDsRd_iN3-k5wyv_jlIXtTOJUwCQQZ5I5lhsXlwU936Xw_j41iT8oQ8Vc7_y1byWcLndWGKe2tiR21jWEUIa1Io4xPXyDGzSN0dxIu4zLCRq_C0x5_Udrso80rntxZ4t-JNSyTk/s1600/Random+Musings.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="clear: left; float: left; margin-bottom: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" height="193" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEigeJ2i5wDsRd_iN3-k5wyv_jlIXtTOJUwCQQZ5I5lhsXlwU936Xw_j41iT8oQ8Vc7_y1byWcLndWGKe2tiR21jWEUIa1Io4xPXyDGzSN0dxIu4zLCRq_C0x5_Udrso80rntxZ4t-JNSyTk/s200/Random+Musings.jpg" width="200" /></a></div>Yes, I have been a slacker lately. I admit it. But, hey, we did two shows the week before last when we covered Orly's Great Hawaiian Adventure with Paul Irey and Douglas Vogt in tow. Speaking of Paul Irey, someone must have pointed him to my <a href="http://rcradioshow.blogspot.com/p/paul-irey-and-doug-vogts-incredible.html">critique </a>of his flawed analysis. He popped in with a couple of comments as "Anonymous". Mr. Irey again demonstrated his lack of credentials as a document examiner. He also can't understand why the Department of Health in Honolulu would not allow the crackpot Orly Taitz and her two biased amateur <strike>buffoons</strike> "experts" in with their microscopes and scanners to examine a document that they are prevented by law from viewing.<br />
<br />
In case you have not seen it yet there is a new Facebook Group called <a href="http://www.facebook.com/groups/225611107468288/">Orly's World</a> that has generated quite a bit of activity. A few Birthers have joined to regurgitate the same lies about the authenticity of the LFBC and COLB and to try to rewrite the definition of "natural born citizen" based on sheer fantasy.<br />
<br />
Our previous guest on RC Radio, Tim Adams, submitted his masters thesis titled <a href="http://digitalcommons.wku.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=2074&context=theses&sei-redir=1#search=%22Tim%20Adams%22">Discourse and Conflict: The President <span style="font-size: large;"><b>Barak </b><span style="font-size: small;"></span><b> </b></span>H. Obama Birth Certificate Controversy and the New Media</a>. [emphasis added] In fairness to Adams the misspelling of the President's name is on the cover sheet that may have been prepared by someone else at Western Kentucky University. This is a small sample of Adams' writing style that he calls "New Journalism" from "Chapter II - The Beginning":<br />
<br />
<blockquote>Down in the Bluegrass </blockquote><blockquote>Unbeknownst to my detractors—being as I was coming to Western Kentucky<br />
University from my alma mater, the University of Hawaii—I had already been vetted<br />
many times. I’ve held several positions in both military and civil service, each of which<br />
required both a background check and a top secret or higher security clearance. I had just<br />
recently been invited to the Honolulu Police Academy as part of their community<br />
enforcement program but had allowed myself to be dissuaded by my then-current love<br />
interest’ fears of such a job. A short time later, the girl was gone and so was my<br />
opportunity, as is so often the case when dealing with women. </blockquote>Yes, that is what apparently is acceptable for a masters thesis in English these days at Western Kentucky. ConWebBlog provided a review of both Adam's thesis and Jack Cashill's fluff piece on it in World Net Daily: <a >="" href="http://conwebwatch.tripod.com/blog/index.blog?entry_id=2227713">Tim Adams'Crappy Masters Thesis</a><br />
<br />
<blockquote>What self-respecting professor would not have rejected Adams' thesis outright for this massive typo alone?</blockquote><blockquote>Adams makes other embarrassing errors as well. For instance, he writes, "The other reason anyone daring to call the current administration into question is because to quote the Rolling Stones, 'Meet the new boss/same as the old boss' ('Teenage Wasteland')" -- managing to get both the name of the song the lyric comes from and the band that performed it completely wrong. (It's "Baba O'Riley" by The Who.) He also misspells WND editor Joseph Farah's name and commits the editing error of introducing him as "Mr. Farar" but not mentioning his first name until 12 pages later.</blockquote><blockquote>As for the thesis itself, once you get past the subpar stabs at Hunter Thompson-esque prose -- indeed, he portrays his entire birther adventure as an attempt at "gonzo" journalism -- it's clear that Adams does not want to tell the full story of "the conflicts surrounding speech and public discourse, and the barriers to and consequences for unpopular speech." </blockquote><blockquote>Adams portrays "Mr. Farar’s people at World Net Daily," along with the people at the tabloid the Globe, as outlets that treated himwell, as opposed to other outlets that "were something less than stellar when it came to the veracity and honesty of their reporting on me." But as we've <a href="http://conwebwatch.tripod.com/stories/2011/wndposterboys.html">detailed</a>, WND did not engage in honesty and veracity in its reporting about Adams, actively hiding the fact that Adams first made his birther claims to a pro-white radio host broadcasting from a conference by an organization descended from Southern anti-integration activists.</blockquote>Dean Haskins is still pimping his big Birther Summit that promises to bring in tens of people. he might even eclipse Carl Swennson's great Pitchfork Rally in Atlanta that drew a dozen. Dean's $15,000 Challenge to Colin Powell to come sit through 3 hours of crazy has gone two weeks with no answer so Dean is now inviting Bill O'Reilly, Anderson Cooper, George Stephanopoulos, and Chris Matthews to be wowed by their "evidence" for pay. (Well, not really because Dean and his buds will determine if they did a super job).<br />
<br />
Meanwhile, in the real world, it appears that our President has scored another significant success as the government of Muammar Gaddafi is falling as I write.Reality Checkhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/00126783152381564733noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7267011437681190669.post-23980147425139792072011-08-03T18:47:00.008-04:002011-08-04T09:06:42.467-04:00Jerome Corsi - Ass Ace Reporter<table align="center" cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" class="tr-caption-container" style="float: left; margin-right: 1em; text-align: left;"><tbody>
<tr><td style="text-align: center;"><a href="http://t1.gstatic.com/images?q=tbn:ANd9GcQaCmMGi6bXlbFfPnXpqOayJuKwPyYZPSuQA6sF7S3NvgTg7ElFNg" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: auto; margin-right: auto;"><img border="0" src="http://t1.gstatic.com/images?q=tbn:ANd9GcQaCmMGi6bXlbFfPnXpqOayJuKwPyYZPSuQA6sF7S3NvgTg7ElFNg" /></a></td></tr>
<tr><td class="tr-caption" style="text-align: center;">WND Reporter Jerome Corsi</td></tr>
</tbody></table>Jerome Corsi has published a series of articles on the extreme right wing blog World Net Daily that purport to expose what he deems to be a vast network of paid Obama operatives who congregate at<a href="http://www.thefogbow.com/"> The Fogbow Forum</a> and who he claims are all over Internet wreaking havoc on poor unsuspecting eligibility deniers (aka Birthers). His <a href="http://www.wnd.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.printable&pageId=311093">first article</a> revealed the identity of field general, PJ Foggy (Bill Bryan) the administrator of the Fogbow forum and a <a href="http://www.wnd.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.printable&pageId=312281">subsequent article</a> focused on The Fogbow member "Rikker". Corsi's article on "Foggy" included a photograph of Foggy with is young sons. It was a nice touch by Corsi to drag Bryan's children into the fray. The original article also included an exhortation for Corsi's readers to call Bryan at his place of business to harass him. That call to harass Bryan seems to have been quietly removed by the author. I personally cannot remember a more disgusting piece of journalism but I am sure if I took some time I could find one on WND and it probably would be under the Corsi byline. <br />
<br />
The <a href="http://www.wnd.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.printable&pageId=327369">latest "masterpiece"</a> from Corsi revealed that he has confirmed that the ring leader of them all, none other than Jimbot, aka Neonzx, who is in real life (according to Corsi) one <a href="http://topics.nytimes.com/topics/reference/timestopics/people/j/james_a_johnson/index.html">James A. Johnson,</a> a Democratic party heavyweight and former chief of Fannie Mae. Johnson is a multimillionaire and at one time headed the team tasked to pick potential running mates for Barack Obama when he secured the nomination in 2008. This choice tidbit of information about Jimbot was supplied to Corsi by the dean of Birther broadcasters Ed Hale. According to Hale, Corsi and his team even flew down to Ed's home in Wellington, Texas to review Ed's evidence about Jimbot. Hale who is best remembered for calling the old Art Bell show and claiming he had killed two Bigfoots (Bigfeet?) gave PJ member Neonzx the nickname Jimbot when he called his show way back in 2008 and Ed decided without any particular proof that "Jimbot" was a White House insider. Now exactly how Ed then decided Jimbot was James A. Johnson is not clear. One clue may be a Friend of the Court brief filed by "J. Johnson" in the <i>Liberi v Taitz</i> case and posted on <a href="http://www.scribd.com/doc/16679118/20090622-Liberi-v-Taitz-Friend-of-the-Court-J-Johnson">Neonzx's SCRIBD page</a>. Gee, that is really conclusive evidence isn't it? How many folks named J. Johnson are there in the United States? Neonzx never says that the brief is his either. <br />
<br />
Another of Corsi's sources is a Birther from Maryland who goes by the handle "KenyaBornObamaCorn" and who was banned from YoutTube for repeated violations of the TOS when she posted videos purporting to out "Obots" including yours truly. Her information was assembled clumsily and was shown to be wildly inaccurate. For example, she originally labeled the same Neonzx as "Justin" who is the administrator of Politijab. She made many other errors too but I don't really want to help her find her mistakes.<br />
<br />
Is Neonzx really James A. Johnson? Several interviews with the real James A. Johnson are available on YouTube including one I found from Australian television from 2009. There are several shows with Neonzx/Jimbot out there too. I didn't have to look far since Jimbot hosted my own Land of the Obots show back in 2009 and has called RC Radio as recently as last week. I put together this audio montage with both of the "Jimbots" so you could listen and judge for yourself. Tale of the Two Jimbots:<br />
<br />
<embed flashvars="audioUrl=https://sites.google.com/site/rcradiofiles/home/files/TwoJimbots.mp3?attredirects=0&d=1" height="27" quality="best" src="http://www.google.com/reader/ui/3523697345-audio-player.swf" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" width="400"></embed><br />
<br />
It is obvious that <b>they are not the same person</b> and that neonzx has a much younger sounding voice than James A. Johnson.<br />
<br />
These photos are also easily found with a quick search: (So why couldn't the great investigative journalist Corsi find these?)<br />
<br />
<table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" class="tr-caption-container" style="float: left; margin-right: 1em; text-align: left;"><tbody>
<tr><td style="text-align: center;"><a href="http://graphics8.nytimes.com/images/2008/06/11/timestopics/jamesjohnson_190.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="clear: left; margin-bottom: 1em; margin-left: auto; margin-right: auto;"><img border="0" height="200" src="http://graphics8.nytimes.com/images/2008/06/11/timestopics/jamesjohnson_190.jpg" width="157" /></a></td></tr>
<tr><td class="tr-caption" style="text-align: center;">James A. Johnson aka "Jimbot"</td></tr>
</tbody></table><br />
<br />
<table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" class="tr-caption-container" style="float: left; margin-right: 1em; text-align: left;"><tbody>
<tr><td style="text-align: center;"><a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEh9BjZJ96GzsvcQgTwZGfcj2V0NmKpjatdnwgEKpm_mkLhSCmYNxVER0ZeLlYcU4UYIetuFYV28fh8S4-_OMGA2jMCbZhGcsLApcV33dQKga5ukkqzkngajXFR5pgZcLm7lDbZetnyru_jl/s1600/Jimbot.png" imageanchor="1" style="clear: left; margin-bottom: 1em; margin-left: auto; margin-right: auto;"><img border="0" height="151" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEh9BjZJ96GzsvcQgTwZGfcj2V0NmKpjatdnwgEKpm_mkLhSCmYNxVER0ZeLlYcU4UYIetuFYV28fh8S4-_OMGA2jMCbZhGcsLApcV33dQKga5ukkqzkngajXFR5pgZcLm7lDbZetnyru_jl/s200/Jimbot.png" width="200" /></a></td></tr>
<tr><td class="tr-caption" style="text-align: center;">Neonzx aka Jimbot aka Justin</td></tr>
</tbody></table><br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
Corsi calls himself an investigative reporter but he didn't take five minutes to check out the crap that Ed Hale and KYBOA were feeding him. Any reporter (including this humble blogger and radio host) has first and foremost the duty to try to publish facts. We all interpret those facts but it is another thing altogether to publish what one has to know is a blatant, bold faced lie as has Mr. Corsi. Mr. Corsi seemed to admit on Plains Radio last night that he might just have a small problem with his huge story. He said that his source for confirmation of the article about James A. Johnson was PJ Foggy the administrator at The Fogbow. Let me repeat that: Corsi's only confirmation for Ed Hale's concocted fantasy is that a guy with a rooster avatar who is known for mocking and satire all around Birthistan posted mockingly that "Jerome Corsi has found us out". So now that Foggy is deriding Corsi for buying this ridiculous story guess who Corsi is blaming? Why Foggy and everyone on The Fogbow of course. <br />
<br />
On the same program Corsi was going through his roll call of Obots and mentioned "Epectitus" (Frank Arduini) who was my guest on RC Radio a few weeks ago. Corsi said "I plan to call Frank's employer to see if they agree with Arduini's views on Obama's eligibility". Really? Does it really matter to this faux-journalist what Arduini's employer thinks? Why doesn't Corsi man up and admit that he is behaving like a vindictive child and wants to cause any problems he can for everyone who dares to criticize him or other Birthers?<br />
<br />
Corsi published these lies because he has an agenda. He wants to sell his book to Birthers and to defame the President and his supporters. He couldn't care less for the truth. Mr. Corsi, this is Harvard University calling. We would like our PhD back.Reality Checkhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/00126783152381564733noreply@blogger.com6tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7267011437681190669.post-89113812354431091362011-07-28T13:35:00.001-04:002011-07-28T13:36:59.223-04:00Doctor Conspiracy on RC Radio<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;"><a href="http://www.obamaconspiracy.org/wp-content/uploads/2008/12/drconspiracy.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="clear: left; float: left; margin-bottom: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" src="http://www.obamaconspiracy.org/wp-content/uploads/2008/12/drconspiracy.jpg" /></a></div>Doctor Conspiracy from <a href="http://www.obamaconspiracy.org/">Obama Conspiracy Theories</a> will be my guest on <a href="http://www.blogtalkradio.com/rcr/2011/07/29/reality-check-radio">RC Radio</a> this week when I return to host. Doc just keeps turning out great articles on the Birthers. He recently marked the posting of over 100,000 comments on articles on his blog.Reality Checkhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/00126783152381564733noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7267011437681190669.post-34639483758103764482011-07-08T18:25:00.006-04:002011-07-10T16:05:15.286-04:00Orly's latest carnival side show and why it will fail<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;"><a href="http://t2.gstatic.com/images?q=tbn:ANd9GcRfzR4g6NUX5obDRFhjgJjEHuknlsOdfLVucNkYViYzzM-YClkoIw" imageanchor="1" style="clear: left; float: left; margin-bottom: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" height="233" src="http://t2.gstatic.com/images?q=tbn:ANd9GcRfzR4g6NUX5obDRFhjgJjEHuknlsOdfLVucNkYViYzzM-YClkoIw" width="320" /></a></div>You would would think after a two and a half year year unbroken string of complete and utter failures in the courts that even the most insane of Birthers would be a little skeptical about Orly Taitz latest stupid lawyer trick. But alas no. They are falling for it again. Birther blogs like Birther Reports and Dr. (k)Hate's are frothing at the mouth over the "court ordered" subpoena that Orly mailed to Hawaiian Director of Health Loretta Fuddy to perform an examination of the "original long form birth certificate". The subpoena was issued in the Taitz v Astrue FOIA case in Washington, DC District Court. Here is how Orly <a href="http://www.orlytaitzesq.com/?p=23587">explained </a>her latest bit of legal brilliance:<br />
<br />
<blockquote><i>I served the director of Health with 2 subpoenas.<span style="color: red;"> </span></i><b><span style="color: red;">[Actually, it is 3 subpoenas, but who is counting?]</span></b><br />
<div><i>There are two ways to issue subpoenas: first -generated by an attorney and second-generated by the court. Even if the case is in DC, the subpoena will come from the district court in HI, sine the director of Health is in their jurisdiction.</i></div><div><i>after I served the director of Health, Loretta Fuddy with the the first subpoena, the attorney General of HI responded on her behalf, stating that she will not comply due to the considerations of privacy (totally bogus argument, since Obama already released the document, so he cannot claim privacy as a legitimate issue).</i></div><div><i>I served them with a second subpoena, this time it is signed by the clerk of the court. Meanwhile I am filing a motion to compel with the judge, saying that they are refusing to comply with the first one and I want a court order. If meanwhile they comply with the second subpoena, I will withdraw the motion.</i></div><div><i>I have multiple opportunities and multiple ways to get there. I’d like to keep my cards close to my chest, so I will not explain further. All I can say, that If the judge does not rule in my favor in the case at hand, I will continue on multiple fronts and at the end of the day a number of people will be sitting in prison. Several highly positioned individuals will be in hot water. ObamaFraudGate and ObamaforgeryGate is 100 times bigger, than Watergate. It will not go away, it will only grow bigger and it will swallow more and more officials. Democrat party will end up completely annihilated, if it lasts much longer. also, there is a backlash against sitting republican congressmen and senators. My feeling is, that during the next election sitting congressmen from both parties will end up being sent home: Republicans will be sent home during the primary, Democrats -during the general election. </i></div></blockquote>Deputy Attorney General for Hawaii, Jill T. Nagamine, sent a <a href="http://www.scribd.com/doc/57878406/Letter-to-Orly-Taitz-From-Hawaii-AG-Re-Subpoena-BC-Cannot-Be-Provided-Per-HI-State-Law">letter </a>to Taitz in response to her first subpoena that Orly had signed and explained why there was no way they would comply with the stupid request. She quoted the pertinent sections of Hawaiian law 338-18 that lists who is entitled to get a copy of another persons birth records and Orly is not on the list. Orly believes that since the President released a copy of his LFBC on April 27 that it somehow magically changes the law.<br />
<br />
A commenter named "pro graphics" on Birther Reports was so excited that he is offering Orly advice on choosing the "experts" that she will take to examine the original records come August 8: <br />
<br />
<blockquote><br />
<i> RECAP:</i><br />
<i><br />
</i><br />
<i>1. Gather like-dated documents (Maybe the Nordykes will provide one - that would be ideal)</i><br />
<i><br />
</i><br />
<i>2. Start following leads for experts. A primer for the right approach can be found in this FAQ from applied forensics</i><br />
<i><br />
</i><br />
<i>http://www.appliedforensics.com/faq.html</i><br />
<i><br />
</i><br />
<i>Check their public record of campaign contributions - you don't want to accidentally wind up with a mole.</i><br />
<i><br />
</i><br />
<i>3. ASAP - Get 3 of these people. This could run into real money. Start getting the money together for this right now, and identify the people you want with consultation - investigate their background for campaign contributions - but pay no one yet because we do not know if the subpoena will be honored. If and when it is, DOH is likely to force Orly to rush through the process with only a few days warning - they will try to schedule this on their terms that favor Obama - so Orly must have all her ducks in a row ASAP and be ready to jump.</i><br />
<i><br />
</i><br />
<i>If anyone blows this opportunity - if the document is made available - we'll be in "conspiracy theory" land forever. The only other thing we can do day-to-day for sure, IMO, is continue doing what has been successfully started: get the word out. Stamping, flyers and the rest. Public pressure will do for us what the subpoena situation will not if it should fail. And people need to have the foundation established for them right away - OBAMA'S BIRTH CERTIFICATE IS FAKE - so they immediately understand what Orly says when she releases the result.</i><br />
<i><br />
</i><br />
<i>Someone close and trusted by Orly may want to forward this to her. Might help. You never know. </i></blockquote><br />
So how did Orly obtain the most recent subpoena signed by a clerk from the federal court in Hawaii? A quick check of<a href="http://www.law.cornell.edu/rules/frcp/Rule45.htm"> FRCP Rule 45(a)(3)</a> states that any attorney may obtain a a signed blank subpoena from the clerk of a federal court. This is what Orly did. (Orly stopped reading there unfortunately.) For many reasons including, but not limited to the reasons Deputy AG Nagamine gave in her previous letter to Orly, this inspection of the records will never take place. There is one glaring error in Orly's latest motion to compel that even this humble writer who does not have a legal degree, mail order or otherwise, was able to spot. I am not going to reveal it though. We have given Orly just the right amount of help that she is hopefully going to get exactly what she deserves from Judge Lamberth. It will probably not be what she expects. <br />
<blockquote></blockquote>Reality Checkhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/00126783152381564733noreply@blogger.com3tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7267011437681190669.post-78821144907695975112011-06-30T12:45:00.000-04:002011-06-30T12:45:34.842-04:00Terry Krepel from ConWebWatch will be my guest on RC Radio tonight<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;"><a href="http://conwebwatch.tripod.com/graphics/bloglogo.gif" imageanchor="1" style="clear: left; float: left; margin-bottom: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" height="72" src="http://conwebwatch.tripod.com/graphics/bloglogo.gif" width="320" /></a></div>Terry Krepel from <a href="http://conwebwatch.tripod.com/">ConWebWatch</a> and the companion <a href="http://conwebwatch.tripod.com/blog/">ConWebBlog</a> will be my guest tonight. Terry attended the over-hyped news conference conducted by WorldNetDaily at a rented room at the National Press Club yesterday where WND announced they are suing Esquire for a laughable amount of money because Esquire ran a satirical article claiming Joe Farah had pulled Jerome Corsi's new book on the day of publication. <br />
<blockquote><h1>What's ConWebWatch?</h1>The Internet has spawned a plethora of "alternative" news sources. Some of them -- with substantial financial backing from political conservatives -- claim to offer some version of the “real truth,” the stories you suppposedly don’t get from “mainstream” media.<br />
<br />
In reality, these sites are no less slanted or arrogant than they accuse the "mainstream" media of being. They demonstrate time and again that, despite promoting themselves with words like "fairness," "responsibility," "accuracy" and "balance," their real goal is to attack and discredit anyone who doesn’t agree with them, as well as to promote their own political views -- the same exact thing they accuse the "liberal" media of doing.<br />
<br />
That is why I created ConWebWatch in April 2000 as the first Web site dedicated to analysis and critique of conservative "new media" -- and it is the only one with these organizations as its main focus.</blockquote><br />
<a href="http://www.blogtalkradio.com/rcr/2011/07/01/reality-check-radio">Reality Check Radio at 9 PM EDT </a>Reality Checkhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/00126783152381564733noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7267011437681190669.post-33433367721600225042011-06-25T12:41:00.005-04:002011-07-04T23:04:18.147-04:00Paul Irey's biased analysis - "I knew it was a forgery before I even looked at it"<table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" class="tr-caption-container" style="float: left; margin-right: 1em; text-align: left;"><tbody>
<tr><td style="text-align: center;"><a href="http://www.wnd.com/images/misc/060711PaulIrey.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="clear: left; margin-bottom: 1em; margin-left: auto; margin-right: auto;"><img border="0" height="200" src="http://www.wnd.com/images/misc/060711PaulIrey.jpg" width="156" /></a></td></tr>
<tr><td class="tr-caption" style="text-align: center;">Paul Irey</td></tr>
</tbody></table>Paul Irey was my guest on the second hour of RC Radio last Thursday. Mr. Irey retired from the graphics design and advertising profession. He was also an Air Force clerk back in the 1950's. Mr. Irey claims no expertise in document forensics. His background and lack of credentials would lead one to ask why Mr. Irey took it upon himself to perform an analysis of the Obama long form birth certificate released by the White House on April 27 and declare it a forgery. It would also lead one to question why anyone would take him seriously. World Net Daily seems to the only site with any wide distribution who has published Mr. Irey's "findings". Mr. Irey blames the "corrupt media who are protecting Obama" for not widely distributing his analysis.<br />
<br />
Let's look a little more closely at Mr. Irey's story. Mr. Irey said he became interested in the eligibility issue in 2008 when he heard of Phil Berg and his lawsuit. Mr. Irey has some of the facts wrong on Berg. He claimed Berg had filed his suit in the Pennsylvania courts and that Berg was a "respected attorney" when he filed his suit. Neither of these is correct. Berg filed in the Federal Court in the Eastern District of Pennsylvania and was known as a 911 Truther who wanted both President Bush and VP Cheney tried for treason for their part in the 911 terrorist attack. Mr. Irey repeated the long debunked Birther claim that one could obtain a short form COLB stating Hawaiian birth without having been born in Hawaii. Irey also claimed that he knew the BC was a forgery before he even looked at it because an <u>unnamed</u> Secret Service agent had told him "Obama had not been vetted". Can you say <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Confirmation_bias">confirmation bias</a>?<br />
<br />
<a href="http://rcradioshow.blogspot.com/p/paul-irey-and-doug-vogts-incredible.html">More on Mr. Irey and Mr. Vogt's incredible claims >> </a><br />
<br />
<br />
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;"></div>Reality Checkhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/00126783152381564733noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7267011437681190669.post-16818790516104940102011-06-09T09:57:00.000-04:002011-06-09T09:57:23.698-04:00Transcript of the May 11 Hearing in Hornbeck v Salazar Procured<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;"><a href="http://images.wikia.com/wikiality/images/0/01/OrlyTaitzOwl.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="clear: left; float: left; margin-bottom: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" height="151" src="http://images.wikia.com/wikiality/images/0/01/OrlyTaitzOwl.jpg" width="200" /></a></div>The transcript of the impromptu hearing held by US Magistrate Judge Joseph Wilkinson on May 11 in New Orleans was posted by <a href="http://www.scribd.com/Jack%20Ryan">Jack Ryan</a> and <a href="http://www.thefogbow.com/">Friends of The Fogbow</a> today. The transcript indicates that the report given by Georgetown JD the same evening on RC Radio was indeed very accurate including the two interruptions when Orly's cell phone rang, (Cell phones are not allowed in the court by rule and any real lawyer would have been mortified and turned it off after the first incident). The purpose of the hearing was to discuss Taitz motion to intervene in a case involving the off shore drilling ban imposed after the April 20, 2010 BP spill disaster in the Gulf of Mexico. <br />
<br />
No hearing had been scheduled. However, Taitz didn't bother to read the local rules, misinterpreted the docket, and flew all the way from her palatial mansion in California to New Orleans believing there was to be one. Judge Wilkinson took pity on the ditzy attorney and called attorneys for the other parties to quickly conduct the unscheduled hearing while forcing parties in other cases who had followed the rules and had hearings on the docket to wait. Taitz silly motion to intervene was <a href="http://www.scribd.com/doc/55300298/Hornbeck-v-Salazar-Motion-to-Intervene-Filed-by-Taitz-Denied-5-12-11">denied the following day</a>. <br />
<br />
<a href="http://www.scribd.com/doc/57421647/HORNBECK-v-SALAZAR-TRANSCRIPT-OF-ORLY-TAITZ-5-11-11-Hearing" style="-x-system-font: none; display: block; font-family: Helvetica,Arial,Sans-serif; font-size-adjust: none; font-size: 14px; font-stretch: normal; font-style: normal; font-variant: normal; font-weight: normal; line-height: normal; margin: 12px auto 6px auto; text-decoration: underline;" title="View HORNBECK v SALAZAR - TRANSCRIPT OF ORLY TAITZ 5-11-11 Hearing on Scribd">HORNBECK v SALAZAR - TRANSCRIPT OF ORLY TAITZ 5-11-11 Hearing</a><iframe class="scribd_iframe_embed" data-aspect-ratio="0.772727272727273" data-auto-height="true" frameborder="0" height="600" id="doc_22102" scrolling="no" src="http://www.scribd.com/embeds/57421647/content?start_page=1&view_mode=list&access_key=key-1ead1838ezi62m20rrzv" width="100%"></iframe><script type="text/javascript">
(function() { var scribd = document.createElement("script"); scribd.type = "text/javascript"; scribd.async = true; scribd.src = "http://www.scribd.com/javascripts/embed_code/inject.js"; var s = document.getElementsByTagName("script")[0]; s.parentNode.insertBefore(scribd, s); })();
</script>Reality Checkhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/00126783152381564733noreply@blogger.com3tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7267011437681190669.post-91156749604703382722011-05-24T10:13:00.007-04:002011-06-18T21:26:17.183-04:00Hey, Jerry Corsi, while you are filing criminal complaints how about filing one against your boss<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;"><a href="http://t1.gstatic.com/images?q=tbn:ANd9GcQaCmMGi6bXlbFfPnXpqOayJuKwPyYZPSuQA6sF7S3NvgTg7ElFNg" imageanchor="1" style="clear: left; float: left; margin-bottom: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" height="166" src="http://t1.gstatic.com/images?q=tbn:ANd9GcQaCmMGi6bXlbFfPnXpqOayJuKwPyYZPSuQA6sF7S3NvgTg7ElFNg" width="200" /></a></div>Jerome Corsi the author of the instant comedy classic, <a href="http://theconservativepost.com/WordPress/wp-content/uploads/2009/12/AnimatedPooSteamingCLR.gif">Where's the Birth Certificate</a>, said Sunday night on the Bill Cunningham radio program that he will be "filing criminal charges against the White House for releasing a fraudulent birth certificate". You know the one the State of Hawaii says is valid? Just how does a building commit a crime? RC Radio strongly encourages Corsi to follow through on his pledge. Please call the FBI today and report this heinous crime. While you are at Jerry, we hope you could take the time to report an actual crime that might be in progress in your own house at World Net Daily. Is your boss Joe Farah committing fraud? He solicited donations to pay $15,000 to the hospital where Barack Obama as born. Now your lying weasel of a boss is welshing on that claim and pocketing the money that the poor fools donated. So Jerome, let's get cracking! Call the FBI. Do it today. Time is a wasting. If you need advice on how a citizen can file a criminal complaint we refer you to Walter "Cordwood" Fitzpatrick III and Sharon "Harpie" Rondeau. They both have lots of experience that they can share with you.They can even help you put together a "Fifth Amendment Grand Jury" to do the job.<br />
<br />
If you report these crimes today I will forgive you for not naming the person in the press you say was involved in making the fake long form birth certificate and releasing those 25 Kenyan documents that prove someone tampered with Obama's "Kenyan birth records". All that stuff you promised to release yesterday can wait. Reporting crimes is obviously more important. Please tell us what the FBI has to say.<br />
<br />
<b>Update: </b>Corsi appeared on the nutty Alex Jones radio show today (yeah that 911 Truther so insane that even Freeper owner Jim Robinson can't stomach him). He completely wimped out and said that World Nut Daily had hired a "world famous scanner expert" and that he would let the scanner expert file the criminal complaint. I guess Corsi would rather not known as the person filing groundless criminal complaints with the FBI.Reality Checkhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/00126783152381564733noreply@blogger.com11tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7267011437681190669.post-66560563677257337452011-05-22T09:18:00.000-04:002011-05-22T09:18:19.168-04:00Jonathan Kay on Reality Check Radio<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;"><a href="http://amongthetruthers.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/12/truthers-cover.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="clear: left; float: left; margin-bottom: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" height="320" src="http://amongthetruthers.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/12/truthers-cover.jpg" width="209" /></a></div> If you missed the show with Jonathan Kay last Thursday I think you will be very pleased if you take the time to catch the archived version of the show. (The player on the right side of the blog will do that for you ;) ). Mr. Kay was an outstanding guest. Jonathan is the author of <a href="http://www.amazon.com/Among-Truthers-Cognitive-Underworld-American/dp/0062004816"><i>Among the Truthers - A Journey Through America's Growing Conspiracist Underground</i></a>. He began work on the book in 2008 and originally it was to be about the so called 911 Truth Movement. However, as the Birther Movement spread following the nomination and election of Barack Obama he decided to include a discussion of the Birthers.<br />
When Jonathan talked about the 911 Truthers reaction to contrary evidence I found myself nodding my head several times to myself and thinking yes that is exactly how the Birthers have reacted the mountain of evidence against their claims. Some of the characteristics he attributed to the Truthers included avoidance of news sources with contrary information, clannish behavior and exclusion of "non-believers", and estrangement from other family members. We have all seen similar behavior from the Birthers. <br />
He also talked about how conspiracy theories have arisen in the last decade particularly in America due to traumatic events such as the September 2011 attacks, two wars, and the economic crisis of 2008. I suppose one could by extension assume the Brithers were traumatized by the election of a black man as their President.<br />
There is much more on the show including some great questions from several callers that Kay handled with interest and skill. He complemented the show and particularly was impressed with the intelligence of the callers. So was I, but I am every week. If you would like to contact Jonathan Kay and thank him for spending an hour or so with our little group I beleive you can reach him at this email, info@amongthetruthers dot comReality Checkhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/00126783152381564733noreply@blogger.com0